Western Times: Saturday 7th September 1850

The Exposition of Arts at Devonport: This grand exhibition was formally opened at the Mechanics’ Institute on Monday … (description of event and exhibits, including) … specimens of damask, chintz, hearth rugs, and carpets from Messrs. Pinsent and Co. … 


Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.


Referenced

GRO1036 Devonport: Thomas Pinsent: 1782 – 1872 

Western Times: Saturday 22nd June 1850

Union Street, Torquay: To be let with immediate possession, the convenient and well-accustomed Inn, known as the Golden Lion: For further particulars apply to Mr. Towell, the present occupier, or Messrs. Pinsent and Co. Newton Bushel: June 20th, 1850. 


Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.


Referenced

GRO0518 Devonport: John Ball Pinsent: 1819 – 1901 

Western Times: Saturday 15th June 1850

Board of Guardians: Wednesday: (W. Creek, Esq., Chairman): The Chaplain! Hint to Resign. : The Chaplain’s report was first read as follows June 10, — I have examined the girls school, the 3rd class in their catechism, which appeared to be known, but not intelligibly — the writing books showed some improvement. Gave the 2nd class their collect to write out, which they professed to have learnt the day before, not one could so directly, and only two decently — the spelling indifferent. Gave the 1st class the gospel to write out, which was learnt the Sunday previous, but only one did it well—most of those who attempted it made some mistakes in their spelling, and do not appear to know the difference between the pronoun “thee, and the definite article “the,” with other mistakes equally glaring, still I disposed to think, with these imperfections, that the school is now receiving more attention than it has lately been receiving.” Mr. Courtier would like to know the age of these children in the 3rd class. Mr. Law said the ages of them could not be defined, as they were not ranged according to age, but according to what they knew. Mr. Pinsent said it was very inconvenient for the Board to be continually pestered with these derogatory observations from the chaplain, relative to the girls’ school, and he very much wondered that Mr. Good adopted such a course. Mr. Palk agreed with Mr. Pinsent that it was a great pity the chaplain should adopt such an uncharitable course — where most charity should be looked for, the less was to be found. He thought the sooner the chaplain left his office the better — (hear, hear). Mr. Courtier said he did not know whether he was in order or not, to move a resolution relative to the chaplain. The Chairman thought it the more regular to bring up the report of the House committee first, which was done, and it was found to contain a very flattering remark on the girl’s school, which was received and adopted. Mr. Courtier moved, and Mr. Palk seconded “That the conduct of Mr. Good, the chaplain of this union, towards Miss Heath, the schoolmistress, has been, and is still cruel and vexatious. His many charges against her of moral delinquency, inattention, and neglect of the children have been examined into by committees appointed by this board to investigate the charges, who have reported to this board, that all the charges against Miss Heath, were unfounded. The Board of Guardians cannot help pitying such conduct in a Christian minister, it being unbecoming and indecorous, showing a little of charity, but very much like revenge. The Board having lost that confidence which ought to exist between one of their servants and themselves, do order Mr. Alsop, the clerk, to write the chaplain to desire that he will desist from such conduct in future, or resign the office he now holds under this Board.”  … (ongoing discussion)


Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.


Referenced

GRO0518 Devonport: John Ball Pinsent: 1819 – 1901

Western Times: Saturday 15th June 1850

RIVER AND HARBOUR COMMISSIONERS: Election of Clerk: There has been much contention here during the past week relative to the resignation of Mr. Pearce (who is about to leave the neighbourhood) the clerk of this body, and the election of another person in his stead. The only candidates in the field were Mr. Mackenzie, of the well-known firm of Tozer, Whidborne, and Mackenzie, and Mr. Pidsley, of the firm of Pearce and Pidsley. Perhaps there never was a more active canvassing. The interests of the two firms are very great in this neighbourhood and this was fairly a trial of strength between them; Mr. Pidsley only withdrew at the last hour. It will be recollected that Mr. Tozer was a candidate in the field with Pearce, when the bill was before the house, and only withdrew them because he thought it unfair to oppose when Pearce had obtained the bill; but it was with the understanding that he should be again in the field, if ever there was an election. The election took place at the CourtHouse. There were present Commissioners Bartlett, Tozer, Cartwright, Goodridge, Sweetland, Strachan, Stephenson, Jordan, Mortimore, Eaton, Branscombe, Vallance, Bearne, Baker and Pinsent, jun. …  (continues – Mackenzie elected) …. 


Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.


Referenced

GROxxxx xxxxx

Western Times: Saturday 20th April 1850

Newton Abbot: Board of Guardians: Wednesday: Board of Guardians. — Wednesday. The first sitting of the Board took place on Wednesday. The first business to be considered was the election of chairman for the ensuing year. Mr. Staddon proposed, and Mr. Chichester seconded — “That the Rev. C. Wolston be the chairman for the ensuing year.” G. S. Curtis, Esq., was proposed by Mr. Courtier, and seconded by Mr. Maye. Mr. Munroe occupied the chair during the election, which was very exciting during two hours, and much strong feeling was exhibited on both sides. The result was that the Rev. C. Wolston was returned by a majority of two. The rev. gentleman took the chair, much against the wishes of the opposing party, who said that the business had been conducted unfairly, declaring that the poll had been kept open unduly, to receive the names of some persons, who were not then present, which had turned the scale. This was, however, denied by the chairman, and the party in favour of the Rev. Mr. Wolston. Mr. Curtis voted in favor of his opponent. W. Creed, Esq. and G. S. Curtis, Esq. were selected vice-chairmen for the ensuing year, the Rev. T. Kitson having resigned. The following committees were then appointed. Finance Committee: Col. Fox, Mr. Courtier, Mr. Creagh, Mr. Whidborne, Mr. T. Rendell, Mr. Bearne, Mr. Wale, Mr. Lethbridge, Mr. Law, Mr. Pinsent, Mr. W. Burd, Mr. Thomas, Mr. T. Wills, Mr. J. Harvey, Mr. W. Sparke, Mr. Peckins, Mr. Staddon. Committee to Inspect Tenders: Mr. T. Rendell, Mr. Stooke, Mr. Pinsent, Mr. Shapley, Mr. Law, Mr. Staddon, Mr. Hannaford, Mr. Bearne, Mr. Bickford Mr. May, Mr Burd Mr. Palk, Mr. Wale, Mr. Tucker, Mr. T. Wills: House Visiting Cammiltee: Mr. Hole, Col. Fox, Mr. Bearne, Mr. Woolland, Mr. Wale. Mr. Pinsent, Mr. W. Rendell, Mr. Stooke, Mr Law, Lieut. Lethbridge, Mr. T. Rendell, Rev. H. Woolcombe, Mr. E. Palk, Mr. R. Burd, Rev. T. Kitson, Mr. Pike, Mr. J. Bickford, Rev. J. Taylor, Mr. J. Harvey, Mr J. Maye, Mr. J. Harvey. Medical Committee: Mr. W. Rendell, Mr. I. Rendell, Mr. T. Rendell, Mr. Courtier, Mr. Hole, Mr. Skinner, Mr. Lethbridge, Mr. Creagh, Rev. F. S. Taylor, Col. Fox, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Palk, (Highweek) Mr. Burd. On the board resuming for general business, a report of the visiting committee was read, recommending that Mr. Gillard, the medical officer, should have £12 for his increased work in the town, and £8 for Kingsteignton. It was moved by Mr. Palk, seconded by Mr. Hole, that the report be received. Lieut. Lethbridge said he could not conceive that the medical man could do the work required of him, at the rate Mr. Gillard was doing it; he had only 1s 11d per day for attending 59 sick people in the house, and only £8 a year for Kingsteignton, where there had been a great deal of work. Mr. French was for retrenchment, and thought these no times for increase of salaries, and should therefore vote against it. Mr. Palk had heard from the commissioner that there was to be a reduction in all salaries, and he felt that it should be carefully done, except in cases of old and tried servants such as Mr. Gillard. Mr. Kitson spoke highly of the efficiency of Mr. Gillard, whose mode of treating paupers was a great improvement on that of his predecessor. He had heard from Mr. Woolcombe that the rate of mortality at Kingsteignton through the past year had been one in twenty-seven! He thought Mr. Gillard deserved something for his extra trouble. Mr. Courtier was against giving gratuities. If the medical man in his parish had made an application for an increase of salary a few months ago, the ratio of deaths and sick cases under his care would have warranted it. Some months were very different from others; the rate of mortality varied much. If anything was required, he would give it in the shape of an increased salary and would vote for any fair increase required for Mr. Gillard. Mr. Westcott moved, and Mr. Staddon seconded — that the report be received and adopted, which was carried by 15 to 6. (also) … A meeting of the ratepayers took place at the Town Hall on Monday evening last – above 100 were present – to consider what steps should be adopted relative to the report of G.T. Clarke, Esq., Superintending Inspector to the General Board of Health, on the Sewage, Drainage, Supply of Water, and the Sanitary Condition of the Town. J. T. Coward, Esq. was voted to the chair …  (discussion) … Mr. Edward Beazley moved, and Mr. J. Pinsent seconded – “That the statement addressed to the General Board of Health, presented to this meeting by the committee appointed at a public meeting of the ratepayers of Wolbourgh, on the 17th day of Decr. 1849, and which statement has been now read, be received and adopted by this meeting and that the chairman do sign the same in behalf the meeting and forward the statement to the General Board of Health”. 


Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.


Referenced

GRO0518 Devonport: John Ball Pinsent: 1819 – 1901

Western Times: Saturday 20th April 1850

The Western Agriculturist: Royal Agricultural Society: At the weekly meeting of the Council, held on Wednesday, Henry Watts, Esq., of Teignmouth, J. N. Stevenson, Esq., of Moretonhampstead; John Wreford, Esq., of Lapford; Thomas Pinsent, of Kingsteignton, and W. Creed, Esq., of Abbotskesewll were admitted as members. 


Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.


Referenced

GRO1036 Devonport: Thomas Pinsent: 1782 – 1872

Western Times: Saturday 26th January 1850

The Torquay Expenses Again, and Mr. Tucker, The Auditor’s Decision:  This matter was again brought up. Mr. Tucker, who was present, desired that his letter to the clerk, in answer to the request that he should attend there today, should be read. The purport of this letter was that he was not in a position to give them legal advice, he being the auditor. He said that, not being acquainted with the individual circumstances of the case, he could not go into the matter in detail; but was willing to give them his opinion on the general law, and on the report generally — (hear, hear) — but still would not be bound on the day of audit, by any opinion he might give to-day, as there might be particular circumstances, which he now knew nothing of. He asked if the Torquay committee were legally appointed and was told that had never been questioned or doubted by the Board. He said the next question was whether the charges were too much? If such was the case, then the persons who signed the cheques issued payment, would themselves be liable. The Chairman then explained the course that had been taken, in reference to the report which has before appeared; these facts are by no means new to the readers of The Western Times. He said he had always felt a difficulty attending the matter; and he hoped after what Mr. Tucker had said, in reference signing the cheques, that would convince them he was not altogether wrong in the steps he had taken — (hear, hear, from the Torquay guardians). Knowing how great the responsibility was had made him anxious to get legal advice on the matter … (Considerable discussion) … Mr. G. S. Curtis said—Having heard Mr. Tucker’s decision, he saw no cause to regret the step he took last week; he had always thought that the charges should be made upon the parish of Tormoham — and that they should shift what they could from off their shoulders — (hear, hear). He moved — “That the Poor-Law Commissioners be requested to procure the best legal opinion as to the individual responsibility of Guardians signing cheque in reference to payments from the Board.” Mr. Creed seconded it. Mr. Curtis and Col. Fox both declared they would not sign the cheque until this opinion was procured. Mr. Pinsent moved that the whole of the expenses be charged to the Parish of Tormoham.” Col. Fox seconded it, saying his reason for doing so was that the question as to whether the chairman was not bound to put the motion, on late occasion, was too great to be blinked. Mr. Stark, and the Rev. Mr. Wolfe, protested against this motion being put; Mr. Stark thinking it a grievous thing that the Tormoham ratepayers should be saddled with an enormous rate, when it was known the majority of charges must go to the common fund. Mr. Hack said a parish meeting must be called to grant the money, and there would be some difficulty in getting it; he for one should advise the ratepayers of Tormoham not to grant it. Mr. Creed could not allow the question to pass without making a remark. He thought it an extraordinary proceed on the part of the Board, and a great injustice to the parish of Tormoham; an injustice, if this motion were carried, which the Board would be committing with their eyes open, Yolland moved and Mr. Palk seconded — “That the report of the committee be brought up, received, and adopted.” This was also protested against by the guardians of Tormoham: Mr. Pinsent withdrew his motion, and Mr. Yolland’s stood an original motion. Mr. Staddon moved as an amendment — “That the report be received and adopted, as far as is legal.” The amendment was lost, and the original resolution carried by 16 to 2. The Rev. Mr. Wolfe then moved — “That the several parishes whose quota is in arrear, shall receive a notice from the clerk, and if not paid up by this day week, shall be summoned.”


Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.


Referenced

GROxxxx xxxxx