a history
Prospectus: Ruths Steam Storage Limited: … Solicitors … Pinsent & Co. 6 Bennett’s Hill, Birmingham.
Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.
His Valet in England: “The Best Friend I Ever Had.” Samuel Insull’s former valet, Mr. Obey, of Pincents Farm, Theale, Bucks, said to the Sunday Dispatch last night: “Mr. Insull is one of the most honest men who ever walked. I always knew he would get off. Some friends of mine who recently came over from America told me that 75 percent of Chicago’s population were heart and soul in his favour. Although it is seven or eight years since I saw him, I can say that Mr. Insull was the best friend I ever had.”
Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.
Prospectus: … Mann & Overton Limited: … … (details) … … Prospectuses are available tomorrow (Monday), June 8th 1935 and may be obtained from: … (list includes) … Pinsent & Co., 6 Bennett’s Hill, Birmingham 2 and London …
Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.
Prospectus: … Bennis Combustion Limited: … … (details) … … Full Prospectuses and Applications are available tomorrow (Monday), 3rd June 1935, and may be obtained from: … (list includes) … Pinsent & Co., 6 Bennetts Hill, Birmingham 2 and London …
Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.
Prospectus … Stewart’s Cash Stores Ltd. … … Details … … Solicitors: Pinsent & Co., 36 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, W.C. 2 and 6 Bennett’s Hill, Birmingham 2 …
Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.
Prospectus: … Broom and Wade Limited: … … (details) … … Full prospectuses and application forms will be available tomorrow (Monday), February 25th, 1935, and may be obtained from: … (list includes) … Pinsent & Co., solicitors, 6 Bennetts Hill, Birmingham 2 …
Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.
Prospectus: … General Aircraft Limited: … directors … (description of purchase of Monospar System of Aircraft Construction) … The Solicitors: Pinsent & Company, 6 Bennett’s Hill, Birmingham 2
Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive
French High-handedness in Newfoundland: The Newfoundland Fisheries Commission, presided over by Sir Robert Pinsent, closed on Tuesday after six days’ investigation. The evidence showed high-handed proceedings on the part of the French during the past three years. In 1883 the people were prevented by Commander Russell from prosecuting the herring fishery. The French ordered their nets to be taken up, and prohibited them from fishing. In 1891 the French forbade the sale of herrings to Americans, and themselves gave only forty cents a barrel. The losses were shown to be not less than 20,000 dols., and after a careful examination by Judge Pinsent the claims made were fully established. The grand jury’s presentment set forth as grievances that the lobster factories had been closed, that the people had been deprived of the herring fishery, and that their nets had been robbed by Frenchmen before their eyes.
Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive
GRO0747 Hennock: Robert John Pinsent: 1834 – 1893
Pinsent v. Pinsent: The petitioner is Queen’s Counsel in practice in Newfoundland and is also a member of the Legislative Council of the colony. He married the respondent, who was the daughter of a merchant, in 1856, and they had several children. Some years after their marriage they made the acquaintance of the co-respondent. He was then a lieutenant in the 62nd Regiment of Foot, but retired from the service on his marriage in Newfoundland, and became Deputy Assistant Adjutant-General of Volunteers, and Aide-de-Camp and Secretary to the Governor of the colony. Towards the close of 1867 Mrs. Pinsent came to England. The co-respondent followed shortly afterwards, and it was subsequently discovered that during their stay in this country they cohabited as man and wife. The letters which passed between them also left little doubt that the intimacy was of long standing. Mr. Pinsent now prayed for a dissolution of the marriage, and also claimed damages against the co-respondent. Dr. Deane admitted that he could not deny the charge and addressed the jury in mitigation of damages. The jury found for the petitioner and assessed the damages at £3,000. The Court granted a decree nisi, with costs.
Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.
GRO0747 Hennock: Robert John Pinsent: 1834 – 1893
GRO0062 Hennock: Anna Brown Cooke: 1837 – 1882
Police Intelligence: Guildhall: … Robbery by Servants: On Thursday Mary Macklin was placed before the bar, before Sir Peter Laurie, charged with being concerned in stealing a lady’s neck chain, two silver spoons and other articles the property of a lady now at Inspruck. The Chief Clerk explained to the Magistrate that, on a previous day, three persons, now in custody, had been charged by a pawnbroker with offering to pledge some property, supposed to be stolen. They alleged it was the property of a relative of theirs. Subsequently a groom came forward to claim the property, stating that he had found it, and had authorized the parties to pledge it for him. He was detained, and the prisoner then at the bar attended on that occasion to speak on behalf of the groom. The officer, suspecting that the master of the two last prisoners had been robbed, waited upon that gentleman, and after looking at the property he said he knew nothing of it, and that the officer was quite mistaken. From information the officer afterwards received, it appeared that the property had in fact been stolen from that gentleman’s house, and this led to the apprehension of the prisoner at the bar. Wardle, one of the City detective force, stated that from information he had received he went to Dr. Tilt’s, 8, York-street, Portman-square, the master of the prisoner Nary Macklin, and asked him if he had the care of any boxes containing property belonging to a lady abroad? Dr. Tilt said he had, and that they belonged to his sister-in-law, Mrs. Pincent, who was travelling on the Continent, and had been for the last four years. He (Wardle) told him that he had heard that the boxes had been broken open and the property abstracted. He then went into the kitchen with Dr. Tilt, and there saw eight large boxes, which, on examination, he found to have been broken open, and a large portion of the contents abstracted, and the remainder in great confusion. Two of the locks had been put on again. Prisoner was present during the greater part of the examination of the boxes. He (Wardle) afterwards went up to parlour, where he found the prisoner in the care of George Mullineux, another detective officer. He (Wardle) told her he had been told that a gold negligee and two silver gravy-spoons had been stolen from those boxes, and she replied that “the cook had been the first instigator of it,” and that she and the cook first commenced breaking them open. The latter took out a shawl, scarf, piece of linen, piece of calico, and a number of very valuable cameos. She told him (the officer) that her brother, Charles Macklin, and Henry Osborne, who are now in custody, came to her on Thursday last at Dr. Tilt’s, and that her brother took the chain and the spoons from separate boxes; he threw the chain into the air and caught it again, exclaiming, “I’ve done the old gal at last; I’ve got the chain, and she’s got the box.” Previously, Osborne took from one of the boxes a lady’s dress, a piece of linen, and another of calico, and pledged them. They also took away several pairs of boots and shoes. The only portion of the property she had was a single cameo, which was now in the possession of her brother’s sister-in-law. He then took her into custody and conveyed her to the station. The boxes had been opened about two months ago, a short time previous to Osborne leaving the service of Dr. Tilt. The chain and spoons have been valued, the former at about 20 guineas, and the latter about £4; but Dr. Tilt could not identify either, never having seen them before. Dr. Tilt said that Mrs. Pincent had brought from Rome, when she was last an England, a very valuable collection of cameos, none of which had been set, and he believed they were the same that the prisoner stated his cook had stolen. Sir Peter Laurie said it would be necessary, to give time for Dr. Tilt to write to Mrs. Pincent at Innsbruck, and he would remand the case, in order that the prisoners might be brought up, and all charged together. …
Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.
GRO0469 Hennock: Jane Sparrow: 1809 – 1891