Curious Divorce Case: Damage: £3,000. In the Court of Probate and Divorce yesterday, in the case of Pinsent v. Pinsent and Marsham, a petition was heard in which the husband sued for a dissolution of marriage on the ground of the wife’s infidelity. The petitioner is a barrister and Queen’s counsel practising at St. John’s, Newfoundland, and also member of the Legislative Council of the island. He was married to the respondent on April 28th, 1856, and had eight children. The co-respondent was an officer in the Newfoundland Fencibles, aide-de-camp and private secretary to the governor. In December 1867, the petitioner left for England with two of his children, whom he intended to place at school there, and during his absence the foundation of the criminal intercourse was laid. There was no defence, but Dr. Deans addressed the jury in mitigation of damages which were prayed for in the petition. The learned judge, in summing up, observed that here there was no trace of any surmise that the marriage had been otherwise than happy. In fixing the amount of damages, the jury ought to consider the position of the petitioner, as well as the co-respondent’s means of payment. It also appeared that the respondent, availing herself of a letter from her husband, had obtained goods from drapers Woolwich to the extent of £250. The jury found for the petitioner, with £3,000 damages.
[see also Western Times: Tuesday 20th July 1869]
Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.
Referenced
GRO0747 Hennock: Robert John Pinsent: 1834 – 1893
GRO0062 Hennock: Anna Brown Cooke: 1837 – 1882