London Standard: Friday 19th February 1869

Probate and Divorce Court: Hilary Term: 1869 Divorce Causes: March 13, … Pinsent v. Pinsent and Mesham … 

[see also Morning Herald (London): Friday 19th February 1869]


Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.


Referenced

GRO0747 Hennock: Robert John Pinsent: 1834 – 1893
GRO0062 Hennock: Anna Brown Cooke: 1837 – 1882

London Standard: Tuesday 16th February 1869

Law Notices: … Vice Chancellors’ Courts, Lincoln’s Inn: … Before Vice Chancellor Sir R. Malins: – Petition by order: … (includes) … Pinsent v. Vestry of the parish of Kingsteington … 


Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.


Referenced

GRO1036 Devonport: Thomas Pinsent: 1782 – 1872

London Standard: Tuesday 19th January 1869

Law Notices: … Vice Chancellors’ Courts, Lincoln’s Inn: … Before Vice Chancellor Sir R. Malins: – Causes etc: … (includes) … Pinsent v. Vestry of the parish of Kingsteington … His Honour will sit in chambers at 3.35. 


Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.


Referenced

GRO1036 Devonport: Thomas Pinsent: 1782 – 18

London Standard: Wednesday 9th December 1868

Law Notices: Vice Chancellors’ Courts: Lincoln’s Inn: Before Vice Chancellor Sir R. Malins: To be spoken to; … includes … Pinsent v. Vestry of the parish of Kingteignton … 

[see also London Standard: Tuesday 19th January 1869 & London Standard: Tuesday 16th February 1869] 


Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.


Referenced

GRO1036 Devonport: Thomas Pinsent: 1782 – 1872

London Standard: Thursday 11th June 1868

Imperial Parliament: House of Commons: Wednesday: The Speaker took the chair at twelve o’clock: Petitions: The following petitions were presented … (includes) … Also, from Mr. Savery Pinsent of D’Urban, in the colony of Natal, advocate, praying that a dispatch from the Secretary to the Colonies to the lieutenant governor of Natal, dated 13th January, 1868, may be recalled, and that the orders contained in such dispatch may be cancelled … 


Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.


Referenced

GRO0798 Devonport: Savery Pinsent: 1815 – 1886

London Standard: 29th December 1862

Death: Pinsent: 16th, at 7 Francis Place, Stamford Road, Rachael Pinsent, the faithful servant of the late Mr. William Jackson, aged 76. 

[see also Morning Herald (London): Monday 29th December 1862]


Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.


Referenced

GROxxxx xxxxx

London Standard: Friday 10th January 1851 

Births: On the 6th Inst. in St. Aubyn Street, Devonport, wife of R.S. Pinsent, Esq., of a son.  

[See also London Daily News: Monday 13th January 1851]


Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.


Referenced

GRO0009 Devonport: Adolphus Ross Pinsent: 1851 – 1929
GRO0119 Devonport: Catherine Agnes Ross: 1830 – 1906
GRO0741 Devonport: Richard Steele Pinsent: 1820 – 1864

London Standard: Friday 14th June 1850

Police: Guildhall: Yesterday Hugh Robert Macklin, Henry Osborne, Mary Macklin and Susannah Paul, were brought up before Sir Chapman Marshall, for further examination charged with stealing a gold chain, value 20 guineas, two silver spoons, a large quantity of wearing apparel, together with a very valuable collection of Roman Cameson, jewellery and other articles of virtue, the properly of Mrs. Pincent, at present residing at Inspruck. The case was briefly stated to the alderman as follows: — The female prisoner (Macklin) and Henry Osborne were in the service of Dr. Tilt, of York-street, Portman-square. About two months ago, eight boxes, which contained a considerable amount of property of various descriptions, and which were in Dr. Tilt’s kitchen (having been deposited in his care by his sister-in-law, Mrs. Pincent, about four years previously), were broken open by the prisoners Osborne and the two Macklins, and the most valuable of the property abstracted therefrom. Subsequently Osborne left the service of Dr. Tilt, and soon after Hugh Macklin and Susannah Paul were given into custody on suspicion, for attempting to pledge the chain and the spoons for a very trifling amount. The following day Osborne came forward for the purpose of exculpating the two prisoners that were then in custody, and he was also detained. When Mary Macklin appeared to vouch for his character, which led to her apprehension a few days after, she confessed all she knew relative to the robbery. On the last examination Susannah Paul was admitted to bail, because the alderman considered she was the least guilty party, having been led into the attempt to pledge the articles by the prisoner Hugh Macklin. The following was the additional evidence taken yesterday: — George Wardell said he went to No. 26, Chancery-lane, the house of a Mr. Toogood, where he s»w Hugh Macklin’s sister-in-law, who immediately placed the cameo in his possession which Mary Macklin stated she gave her. She was unable to attend and give evidence in consequence of ill health. The officer produced the cameo, which was of the most exquisite workmanship, and without any setting. He had inquired at various jewellers and ascertained its value in its present stale to be about five guineas. He also produced several duplicates of some articles of dress which had been given to the husband of the prisoner Paul by Hugh Macklin. He wished the alderman to remand the prisoners for a week, as there was a party implicated in the robbery who was not at present in custody, and whom it would be necessary to obtain time to apprehend, as also for the purpose of tracing the remainder of the property which had been stolen. Bail was again taken for Susannah Paul, and the case was remanded till this day week for further evidence. 

[see also Morning Post: Friday 14th June 1850] 


Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.


Referenced

GRO0469 Hennock: Jane Sparrow: 1809 – 1891