Colonies and India: Saturday 24th January 1891

Literature: Notices of New Books: … Geography of the Dominion of Canada and Newfoundland: by the Rev. William Parr Greswell, M.A. (Oxon), F.R.C.I. with 10 maps: (Clarendon Press). This is a fairly interesting and concise geographical study of Canada and Newfoundland and is evidently intended to form a supplement to the brief historic study of those two countries which was lately issued from the Clarendon Press. … (discussion) … Some of the information given about Newfoundland has been derived from Sir Robert Pinsent. In the appendix to the volume there will be found some interesting statistics of the fisheries of British Columbia …


Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.


Referenced

GRO0747 Hennock: Robert John Pinsent: 1834 – 1893

Glasgow Herald: Friday 18th April 1890

[Review of dispute between the British and French Governments over the fishery in Newfoundland] … The case for the Colony as stated by Chief Justice Pinsent is that the French have no right whatsoever to this industry, that they have no right to take bait fishes within the treaty limits for any other purpose than for the local cod-fishery, and that they have no right to take bait for export. The colonial case is based on the contention that the Treaty of Utrecht covers only fishing then actually in existence, which was the cod-fishery. It is, therefore, not lawful for the French to erect buildings except those necessary and customary for drying codfish and their rights are limited to fishing for and drying cod within the specified areas. Chief Justice Pinsent lays it down as a principle of law that as there was no such industry as a lobster fishery in Newfoundland at the time of the Treaties of Utrecht and Versailles, and as such a thing as a lobster factory was never even heard of until within the last few years, the right to catch and can lobsters cannot belong to France by treaty.


Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.


Referenced

GRO0747 Hennock: Robert John Pinsent: 1834 – 1893

Bristol Mercury: Monday 14th April 1890

Review of “Nineteenth Century” article by the Hon. Mr. Justice Pinsent … 

[see similar Morning Post: Wednesday 2nd April 1890]


Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.


Referenced

GRO0747 Hennock: Robert John Pinsent: 1834 – 1893

County Advertiser & Herald for Staffordshire and Worcestershire: Saturday 12th April 1890

Magazines: “The Nineteenth Century”: … (review of articles, includes) … Mr. Robert J. Pinsent examines historically the French fishery claims on the coast of Newfoundland and comes to the conclusion on the evidence that the French had reserved to them only the right fish for cod and to erect on the coast such buildings are necessary to dry the cod.  …   


Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.


Referenced

GRO0747 Hennock: Robert John Pinsent: 1834 – 1893

Sheffield Daily Telegraph: Wednesday 9th April 1890

French Encroachments: (from the Dundee Advertiser): The Newfoundlanders are sending over to this country a deputation to lay before the Government and the public their grievances against the French Fishermen. The proposal to recognise the right of the French to erect lobster-canning establishments on the “French Shore” has evidently alarmed the colonists and some of them are demanding the abrogation of our treaties with France and the extinction of French maritime and territorial rights in Newfoundland. In an impartial review of the nature of the French fishery claims which appears in the current number of the Nineteenth Century, Mr. Justice Pinsent, one of the Newfoundland Judges, puts very clearly and fairly the issue between the colonists and the French fishermen. Mr. Justice Pinsent related the history of the connection between this country and Newfoundland from 1497, when the island, by right of discovery, became the property of the English Crown. At a very early date Spaniards, Portuguese and French began to pay attention to the fisheries. The English were somewhat neglectful of the estate to begin with. But by 1578, as appears from Haklyuyt, “the English were commonly lords of the Harbours.” In the reign of Edward VI, an Act was passed for the encouragement of the Newfoundland fishery … (continues) …  The French assert that not only do they have a right to catch lobsters and carry on a canning business, but that the British have no right. To recognise this claim in the face of the protests of the colonists would be a mistake on our part, for it appears plain that the French are demanding what they are not entitled to seeing that, as Mr. justice Pinsent shows, the only fishery contemplated by the high contracting parties was the cod fishery, and the language of the treaties is utterly inapplicable to lobster catching of the erection of factories for preserving and canning lobsters. 

[see also Dundee Advertiser: Monday 7th April 1890 & St. James’s Gazette 31st March 1890]


Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.


Referenced

GRO0747 Hennock: Robert John Pinsent: 1834 – 1893

National Observer: Saturday 5th April 1890

“Put Yourself in his Place:” The Newfoundland Fisheries question, admirably summarized by Mr. Justice Pinsent in “The Nineteenth Century,” has readied a very critical stage, and the public seems hardly to realize the dangers with which it is fraught. It is not remarkable that ignorance should prevail on the subject, for since 1886 no papers have been presented to Parliament. It is, however, notorious that the British and French Governments have once more endeavoured to come to some arrangement with regard to the still-vexed question of the fisheries, but that the arrangement is to be adopted only during the approaching fishery season. Whatever may be its merits or demerits, it has failed to satisfy the person’s most concerned, namely, the Newfoundlanders themselves, who have indignantly repudiated the compromise made on their behalf by the Home Government. It is said that they have acted precipitously, and that better acquaintance with the terms of the arrangement will modify their views as to its character. This appears to be the cue of official speakers; and, pending the publication in full of the negotiations, it is impossible to say how for the modus vivendi constitutes an improvement upon the existing condition of affairs, or does justice to the rights of the people of Newfoundland. It is well, however, that the public should understand once for all what a very serious question this is. It is easy enough for us to make pleasant little compromises with the French Government: to show our good feeling towards the Quai d’Orsay by giving up in an ungrudging spirit what does not belong to us, and to prove our sincerity to our sweet enemy by scolding our countrymen in Newfoundland. The operation gives a fine scope for the exhibition of generous feeling, unselfish magnanimity, and impartial justice. But to this, as to most other matters, there are two sides. Let us see how the question presents itself to the Newfoundlander, and what would be our own feelings if we were subjected to similar usage. Let us suppose that at the beginning of the century Portugal, after having been thoroughly beaten on land and sea by Great Britain, had been forced to give up all her conquests save one: that by the carelessness of our diplomatists she had been allowed to retain of the islands of Lewis and Arran, with an exclusive right of fishing the coast of Scotland from Greenock to Dundee. Suppose that this right further carried with it the privilege of landing on any part of the coast … (continues) … [The Scots Observer]


Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.


Referenced

GRO0747 Hennock: Robert John Pinsent: 1834 – 1893

Inverness Courier: Friday 4th April 1890

In the Nineteenth Century, the place of honour is given to two articles on the labour movement, both of which contain salutary truths, though also opinions that must be disputed. Mr. Champion is one of the writers. Mr. Justice Pinsent writes on the French fishery claims in Newfoundland; Lord Ribblesdale on hunting on Gibraltar …


Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.


Referenced

GRO0747 Hennock: Robert John Pinsent: 1834 – 1893

Dover Express: Friday 4th April 1890

Nineteenth Century: Kegan, Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co.: The April number is remarkable for its diversified interest … (includes) … The Hon. Mr. Justice Pensent of Newfoundland contributes a very informing article on the French Fishery claims …


Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.


Referenced

GRO0747 Hennock: Robert John Pinsent: 1834 – 1893

Inverness Courier: Friday 4th April 1890

In the Nineteenth Century the pace of honour is given to two articles on the labour movement, both of which contain salutary truths, though also opinions that must be disputed. Mr. Champion is one of the writers. Mr. Justice Pinsent writes on French fishery claims in Newfoundland; Lord Ribblesdale on hunting at Gibraltar …


Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.


Referenced

GRO0747 Hennock: Robert John Pinsent: 1834 – 1893

London Standard: Thursday 3rd April 1890

“The Nineteenth Century”: April: 2s 6d. … (includes) … “French Fishery Claims in Newfoundland”, by the Hon. Mr. Justice Pinsent (of Newfoundland) … (etc) …


Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.


Referenced

GRO0747 Hennock: Robert John Pinsent: 1834 – 1893