Appeals: Knight v The Parish of Kingsteignton: … Mr. Karslake, in opening the case, said it involved the question of rating a canal in the parish of Kingsteignton and the property of Mr. Knight, the appellant. The canal, which was half a mile in length, was made by Mr. Knight on Lord Clifford’s property at considerable expense, it being brought down to the navigable river Teign … (considerable discussion) … Mr. Collier asked if it was admitted that 18,000 tons of clay had been carried for Messrs. Watts and Co., clay merchants? He understood the company were bound to have conveyed through the canal, 18,000 tons at the minimum cost 1s 6d per ton. Mr. Karslake admitted that such was the case. The Messrs. Watts paid upon 18,000 tons, whether that quantity was carried or not. There was, however, the question of deductions to be considered. The first item of expenditure to be deducted was – bargemen’s wages, £542 12s; then there were – repairs of the canal, £23 1s 1d; repairs of barges and boats. £40 13s 11d, tithe rent charge £1 5s; collector’s poundage, £79 10s 5d; wages to two shipping agents £9 6s, rent paid to Lord Clifford for land, £15; rent paid to Mr. Pinsent for land, 11s; paid to Mr. Edwards for clearing a water course 5s. …
[see similar Exeter and Plymouth Gazette: Saturday 10th January 1857].
Transcribed in whole or part from scanned originals: Presented with or without modified text and punctuation. For absolute accuracy refer to the original newspapers. Source: The British Newspaper Archive.
Referenced
GRO0518 Devonport: John Ball Pinsent: 1819 – 1901