Vital Statistics
Thomas James Pinsent: 1833 – 1915 GRO1259 (Baker and Property Developer, Fitzroy, Melbourne, Australia)
Elizabeth James: xxxx – 1908
Married: 1856: St. Helier, Jersey
Children by Elizabeth James:
Thomas James Pinsent: 1858 – 1932 (Married (1) Clara Jessie Candy, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia); (2) Ellen Oldfield, Victoria, Australia, 1902)
William Henry Pinsent: 1860 – 1860
Elizabeth Pinsent: 1861 – 1870
Joseph Henry Pinsent: 1863 – 1945 (Married (1) Annie Edith Miller, Clifton Hill, Victoria, Australia, 1885; (2) Emma Stranger, Victoria, Australia, 1914)
Charles Samuel Pinsent: 1864 – 1930 (Married Edith Mary Dear, Victoria, Australia, 1892)
William John Pinsent: 1866 – 1905
Family Branch: Australia
PinsentID: GRO1259
Click here to view close family relatives.
Thomas James Pinsent was the son of William Pinsent by his wife, Sarah (née Eales). His father was a “tailor” and Thomas was born in the “Three Towns” (i.e. Plymouth, Devonport and East Stonehouse) in 1833. He grew up in Exeter where a younger sister, Elizabeth, joined the family in 1836. William Pinsent probably came from Ilsington Parish and he probably married Harriet Morgan, in Dursley, in Gloucestershire and had a second family after Sarah’s death but I have yet to find irrefutably evidence that the two families are linked to the same William Pinsent. Sarah probably died sometime after the birth of her daughter in 1836 but before William remarried in 1840. For now, his early off-spring are assigned to a separate AUSTRALIA family line. William, himself, follows the BRISTOL line.
Thomas James Pinsent married Elizabeth James at St. Helier’s Church on Jersey in the Channel Islands in 1856 and they went out to Australia shortly thereafter. Fifty years on, they placed the following announcement in the Melbourne Argus (Saturday 16th June 1906): “PINSENT — JAMES: — [Golden Wedding.] — On the 15th June, 1856, at St. Helier’s Church, Jersey, by license, by Dean Le Breton, Thomas James, eldest son of the late William Pinsent, of Plymouth, to Elizabeth, youngest daughter of the late Captain Samuel James, of Redruth, Cornwall. Present address, Alexandra-parade, Fitzroy.” What sort of “captain” Samuel James was is not specified.
The 1851 census, which had been compiled only a few years earlier, states that Thomas James was a “baker” (presumably an “apprentice baker”) but his marriage certificate has him down as a “labourer”. From the certificate we also learn that his father-in law was a “miner” – so for “captain” we should probably read “shift boss” or “foreman”.
Thomas and Elizabeth (née James) went out to Melbourne, in Victoria, soon after their marriage and headed for Ballarat (115 kilometres northwest of Melbourne). Gold had been found in the rivers there in 1851 and Ballarat was a typical, fast-growing, “gold-rush” town. The initial rush was over by the time Thomas and Elizabeth arrived, but conditions at the “diggings” must have been pretty primitive. The Colonial Government in Melbourne made the mistake of increasing the cost of “mining licenses” a couple of years earlier and the “miners” had rioted. The Government had responded in a heavy-handed manner and sent in the troops. There were, predictably, casualties and arrests. Nevertheless, the Ballarat “miners” won the right to hold local elections and, from then on, the community started to evolve from a highly disorganized tent city to a structurally (and politically) more sound wooden and, later, extremely affluent stone-built one.
It is worth noting that Thomas’s probable uncle, Joseph Pinsent – from the BRISTOL branch of the family – had settled in New South Wales in Australia in 1850 (New South Wales Assisted Immigrant Passenger list: 1828 – 1896). Joseph had spent some time in Redruth working in the mines and he had married the daughter of a Redruth miner in 1843 – so Thomas James had a connection to the place. Nevertheless, there is no indication that the families kept in touch or even knew each other. For some reason Joseph and his family kept the “Pinson” name spelling. His descent is described elsewhere.
Shortly after their arrival, Thomas James and Elizabeth set up a bakery in Ballarat, presumably on the premise that selling food to “miners” was a more reliable way of acquiring gold than digging for it. They had three children while living there; however, only the first, another Thomas James Pinsent, was strong enough to survive rigors of a frontier town. Thomas’s second son William Henry Pinsent died soon after birth and their third child, a daughter Elizabeth Pinsent, succumbed at the age of nine.
Keeping “Law and Order” in a frontier town is difficult at the best of times but the long arm of the law had made its way to Ballarat since the riot. In December 1860, Thomas James was brought up at Ballarat “General Sessions” charged with stealing a box of currants and a chest of tea, valued at 16s from one of his neighbours, William Hay, who was a local “storekeeper”. Thomas pleaded “not guilty.” However, another neighbour testified that he had seen Thomas take what he had thought was an empty tea chest from Mr. Hay’s store on “Peel Street”. Also, when he (Mr. James Lowe) had asked Thomas what he was doing, he had said he was “having a lark with the old man” who was drunk and asleep in his parlour. According to Lowe, Thomas had asked him if he knew where Hay kept his money… Another shopkeeper testified that he saw Thomas slip furtively by his shop heading towards Mr. Hay’s imporium and thought it odd but no more, as he thought Pinsent to be an honest man. The police found nothing to incriminate Thomas in his house; however, he was arrested. Another “storekeeper” and a local “publican” both spoke up for him, but he was found guilty and sentenced to twelve months imprisonment (Ballarat Star: Friday 7th December 1860; Monday 12th November 1860).
The episode must have caused considerable tension in the community and Thomas’s wife Elizabeth put up with a considerable amount of abuse while her husband was in jail. In January 1861, she sued Mr. Hay in the “Eastern Police Court”. Several witnesses deposed that Mr. Hay called her a “thief”, used abusive language and considerably unnerved her by knocking on her windows whenever he passed by. One rebuttal witness said she called him an “Old Vandemonian thief” – meaning a transported convict from Tasmania (Van Diemen’s Land) – which he may well have been. The defendant was fined 40s with £1 5s 6d in costs (The Star (Ballarat), Vic: 1855 – 1864): Thursday 3rd January 1861). I doubt if that improved relations any.
Elizabeth had a young apprentice named David Brooker helping her run the bakery while her husband was away serving time and he was – tangentially at least – implicated in a serious assault charge that was heard in the “Eastern Police Court” in Ballarat later that same year (1861). A Mrs. Ellis charged John Sullivan “a respectable looking young man … with having violated the person of (her daughter) Elizabeth Ellis, a child under ten years of age”. She complained that several boys bullied her daughter and that she had once felt obliged to beat David Brooker in Mrs. Pinsent’s presence for lifting up her daughter’s clothes. She also accused another boy of beating her daughter Elizabeth about the head with a sheep’s head! For her part, the purported victim said that she knew David Brooker through her two brothers but she denied that he had ever lifted up her clothes. As for Mr. Sullivan, the defense lawyer claimed mistaken identity but the magistrates were not convinced and the case against him was held over for further study (The Star (Ballarat), Vic: 1855-1964): Thursday 14th February 1861).
Thomas James Pinsent was back in the “Eastern Police Court” shortly after his release from prison; however, this time as plaintiff and not defendant. He felt obliged to sue a Mr. Ward for £13 4s 3d, a Mr. Welcock for £7 16s 8d and a Mr. Rose for £11 3s 0d for the payment of outstanding bills (The Star (Ballarat, Vic.: 1855-1964): Thursday 2th March 1862). The following week, he was back with a similar complaint against a Mr. Smith. All in all, Thomas’s bakery seems to have done very well. Certainly, he was able to purchase a “Town Lot” (Allot 4, Sec. L., 7 – 4 – 10p; Valuation £125, T. J. Pincent, £6 19s.) in Wills Street in Ballarat at a “Crown Land Sale” in August 1862 (The Star (Ballarat), Vic: 1855-1964): Saturday 30th August 1862).
Perhaps Thomas James saw the property as an investment rather than a place to live or work as he moved his family to Daylesford (another then more active mining community 50 kilometres northeast of Ballarat) late in 1862 or early 1863. The Victoria Government Gazette (1864) tells us that he had, in fact, purchased “2 roods and 23 perches” of land in Daylesford in 1860. It cost him £51 10s plus £1 “fee on deed” and 2s 1.5d as an “assurance fee” – whatever that was. We know that Thomas still owned property in Daylesford in 1871 as the Victoria Government Gazette lists people in default in payment on their rates. In 1871, the Daylesford City Fathers put in a demand for “John James and Pinsent” to pay them 10s for a house on West Street. John James may, conceivably, have been one of Thomas’s wife, Elizabeth’s relations.
The Government Gazette also tells us that Thomas James Pinsent of Daylesford owned three shares in the “Champion Gold Mining Company” – a firm that held claims on “Shepherd’s Flat”, near Frankinford. Whether he made anything on the venture, I am not sure. Thomas and Elizabeth had two more sons, Joseph Henry Pinsent and Charles Samuel Pinsent while living there. They both survived. Their last child, William John Pinsent was, interestingly, is said to have been born – or at least had his birth registered – in Deptford in Victoria in 1866. Deptford is on the Southern coast some considerable distance east of Melbourne in 1866. If true, I do not know why he would have been there.
Thomas James Pinsent also owned four shares in the “Argus Gold Mining Company” and in March 1866 he was called upon to either answer a call for £2 10s to support the operation or loose his shares (Mount Alexander Mail: Monday 19th March 1866). Clearly, not all his investments were winners! The Ballarat and district gold rush was petering out in the late 1860s and Thomas and Elizabeth decided to move to Fitzroy, on the outskirts of Melbourne. They opened a bakery in “Brunswick Street” in Fitzroy in 1868. Their only daughter, Elizabeth Pinsent died there in 1870 and friends were invited to follow her casket to its final resting place in Melbourne “General Cemetery” (Melbourne Argus: Saturday 30th July 1870).
Thomas seems to have been a little lax in complying with municipal and state regulations when he set up his business in Fitzroy. Mr. Donald the “inspector of weights and measures” had him up in “District Court” in October 1868 for having “an imperfect balance” in his handcart (Melbourne Argus: Saturday 17th October 1868). He was fined 10s with 12s 6d in costs. Perhaps one could get away with that sort of thing in the “goldfields” but definitely not in Melbourne. Similarly, the government inspector had him up for neglecting to carry any scales as he went about his business in October 1884 (Mercury and Weekly Courier: Saturday 18th October 1884). This time, he was fined 20s and 5s in costs.
Conditions in Fitzroy in the mid-1880s were still a little rudimentary and Mr. Pinsent felt obliged to write a letter to “Fitzroy City Council” to complain about the state of the drains (Melbourne Argus: Saturday 21st January 1882) shortly after moving his family to “Alexandra Parade” in 1881. Thomas had acquired some development land there and he asked the Council for permission to blast some rock in nearby Brunswick Street to help him develop the site (Fitzroy City Press: Saturday 25th July 1885). The City fathers reviewed the request and granted permission for him to do so and “construct brick and cement sinks and channels in each yard at the rear of three brick cottages, situated in York Street and known as Jersey Cottages” fairly quickly (Fitzroy City Press: Saturday 19th September 1885). His son William put out tenders for building two rooms in 1888 (The Age: Thursday 9th August 1888)
This tells us that Thomas James was in the process of becoming a “property developer” as well as a “baker.” It also tells us that he had not forgotten his early days on Jersey! The “Rate Books” for the City of Fitzroy shows that Thomas J. Pinsent was a “gentleman” who held property valued at £28 on Keen Street in 1887, and that he paid £2 6s 8d per annum for the privilege. The community was growing fast: In May 1890, a business frontage on the corner of Brunswick Street and York Street “adjacent to the Colonial Bank and the business establishments of Messrs. Macmillan, Moran and Cato, White, Pinsent, and others …” in “one of the most improved parts of Brunswick Street, near Alexandra Parade, with trams passing every few minutes” was sold by auction (Melbourne Argus: Tuesday 6th May 1890).
Thomas James was from a “Methodist” family and “Pinsent” – presumably Thomas James, was named one of ten trustees elected to serve at “Brunswick Street Wesleyan Church” in 1891 (Fitzroy City Press: Friday 20th March 1891). His son, who was a well-known artist of the same name, had donated artistic banners to the church the previous year (Fitzroy City Press: Friday 28th March 1890) – which might have influenced the electors, somewhat.
In 1898, Thomas J. Pinsent (presumably senior but possibly junior) was called to testify in Court regarding the “will” of Mr. Horatio Abraham Nelson Snell, who was a furniture dealer in North Fitzroy. According to the proffered “will” – which was unsigned – Mr. Snell left all his estate except a house in Fitzroy to his wife and children. He left the house to his two sisters. A second “will” was later found and then a third magically appeared that favoured his wife and was disputed by his sisters. Thomas had accompanied Mrs. Snell, who was a neighbour, to her solicitor’s office when she went to consult him about the administration of the estate (The Melbourne Argus: Wednesday 6th April 1898 and The Melbourne Age: Thursday 5th May 1898).
By 1903, Thomas James had retired. He was seventy years old and a man of “Independent Means”. By then, he was living with his wife and at least three of his sons in a large house or possibly series of houses at #118 Alexandra Parade (close to Brunswick Street but south of Edinburgh Gardens) in Fitzroy (Australian Electoral Rolls: 1901 – 1936: Ancestry.com). Sadly, his youngest son, William John Pinsent, who was a “boot maker,” died there, unmarried in 1905 at the age of 39 years. The lives of his three remaining sons (Thomas James Pinsent, Joseph Henry Pinsent, Charles Samuel Pinsent) are discussed elsewhere.
Thomas James and his wife Elizabeth celebrated their “Golden Wedding” anniversary while living in Alexandra Parade in 1906. However, Elizabeth died two years later (Melbourne Argus: Wednesday 22nd July 1908) and her will, which is now lodged in the State Archive in Victoria, shows that her husband had transferred to her the ownership of two blocks of development land on which he had built three cottages apiece (in total valued at £1,400). He had also placed two large sums for her in interest bearing accounts (£130 in a London Bank and £130 in the Landridge Building Society). Thomas James was both executor and principal beneficiary. Presumably he paid the appropriate tax and had the assets returned to him. Thomas James and his three sons placed “In Memoriam” notices of remembrance in the Melbourne Argus newspaper on the date she died for several years thereafter (i.e.: Melbourne Argus: Saturday 22nd July 1911).
Perhaps the death of his wife stirred up memories of home as he took a trip back to England after she died. A ship’s manifest (Fremantle, Western Australia, Passenger Lists: 1897-1963: Ancestry.com) shows that Thomas James Pinsent and his son, Joseph “Harry” Pinsent left London for Fremantle in Western Australia on the “S. S. Orsova” on 18th November 1909. Interestingly, they had both been listed in the manifest as “builders” rather than “bakers”. The trip back may not have been Thomas’s first. Passenger manifests for the “S. S. Renown” shows that (1) a Thomas Pinsent, aged 43, traveled from Melbourne to England in August 1876, and (2) that a Thos. Pinsent, aged 44 years returned to Melbourne on “S. S. Northumberland” in March 1877. The latter Thomas was; however, traveling steerage! Despite that, Thomas James is the most likely candidate. He had yet to win out in the development business.
After Elizabeth’s death, Thomas James stayed on at “#118 Alexandra Parade” for the rest of his life; however, he actually died across the Merri River in a private Hospital in Northcote in 1915 (Melbourne Argus: Tuesday 9th February 1915). He died at the age of 81 years and six months and a death notice states that he was been a colonist for 58 years. This confirms that he arrived shortly after his marriage to Elizabeth (née James) in 1856. His will and probate records are also in the Victoria State Archives. They refer to Mr. Thomas J. Pinsent “gent” and describe how he was the owner of six terraced houses on Alexandra Parade and two blocks with five brick cottages on York Street, all of which were build for rental purposes – although it appears that his sons may have had squatters rights. His other assets were minimal but his estate still ran to £2,554. He had clearly taken advantage of the opportunities that came from Melbourne’s growth in the late 1800s. Thomas James Pinsent had come a long way since being locked up in Ballarat!
Thomas James appointed his sons, Thomas James (a “sign writer and decorator”) and Joseph Henry (a “collector”) as his executors and he divided his estates between them and his younger son, Charles Samuel Pinsent.
Family Tree
GRANDPARENTS
Grandfather: John Pinson: 1782 – 1849
Grandmother: Mary Follett: 1782 – 1859
PARENTS
Father: William Pinsent: 1811 – 1879
Mother: Sarah Eales: xxxx – xxxx
FATHER’S SIBLINGS (AUNTS, UNCLES)
Ann Pinson: 1809 – 1862
Elizabeth Pinson: 1814 – xxxx
John Pinsent: 1817 – 1819
Joseph Pinson: 1819 – 1881
Sarah Pinson: 1821 – 1886
John Pinsent: 1823 – 1902
James Pinsent: 1825 – 1886
Samuel Pinson: 1828 – 1833
Thomas Pinson: 1830 – 1832
MALE SIBLINGS (BROTHERS, Half-brothers)
Thomas James Pinsent: 1833 – 1915
William Henry John Pinsent: 1841 – 1923
Sidney Pinsent: 1846 – 1880
Alfred James Pinsent: 1847 – 1848
Please use the above links to explore this branch of the family tree. The default “Next” and “Previous” links below may lead to other unrelated branches.